Creating a Camouflage Network using Quantum Dots and Cameras.

Quantum dot lace for camouflage material. Uses quantum cameras as camera set up.


We entrap the dots between the holes in the material which allows the small camera to feed it within the holes giving super high definition per radius of view of the camera which will be higher than the quantum dot rings around them which will hide the cameras if done properly.

So you have each of the cameras face outwards at what they can ‘see’ and the quantum dots on the opposing side replicate the coloring to allow camouflage. For farther distances or skyward arrangements you take the photons coming in from a set distance and their colour into the cameras and bounce them back with the surrounding quantum dots. So you end up with rings of cross referenced quantum dots and rings of referenced dots that intersect between each other to make a mesh of a third state referenced-interference quantum dots per camera set.

To limit ghosting of images you signify set parameters along the meshes pointing outward as a main set where they take their own information from an area to cross reference so that they can be grounded in a photon cross state limiting their ghosting effect using passing photon beams at a perpendicular angle or depending on the shape being camouflaged within it’s own outer parameters.

In the experiment a light source was pointed behind the soldier and the camera so all we have to do is matrix all light sources by distance and lumens and we can probably use up light or colour of light as well to determine ways to effect the gluons in the photons for higher definition as the gluons are different strengths to give different wave function lengths over space. Meaning we can assume that by the position of any light sources such as the sun rippling or multi head lights overhead the waves cross rippling means at points it’ll be weaker and at times stronger and we just have to pin point the strong points in the 3-d matrix and of light waves collapsing into each other over time varied by wind speeds and water in the air and we’ll be able to move the set of secured points of camera angles into them and then run programs to create the proper trapped quantum dots as needed getting full camouflage.
Hope that helps.

Which subjects would you like me to write about?

I have plenty of time to learn about things while I’m not sleeping.

Things I wish I had. A diamond anvil cell, with multiple rubies and perhaps a pulse laser to force greater pressure down. Something to build carbon structures with like a u.v. laser printer. An x-ray analyzer to understand flow better. A CVD I could reformat to do what I want to show you the new materials I can make from an altered one.

Let me know and I’ll see what I can do.


Quantum computers using photons and electrons.

Quantum computers using photons and electrons.

Photons have spin-1, electron 1/2. Meaning you could condense the number of way electrons at certain speeds and qutrits by using photons to cancel out the spin of unneeded number increasing output speed. At least for spun waves.


Quantum entanglement means there would be a -1/2, +1/2 electron spin. If a proton was spun at it +1 it would become 1/2 and +1.5 for the +1/2, while a quantum entangled proton with -1 become -1.5, -1/2. Meaning you could divert three +/-1 times the number of electrons into the proton entanglement getting up to 4 times the output (certainty of randomness?) As the single entanglements would negate to zero or be interfered again with light.

Would it also mean that if the entangle particles collapsed before the photon affected ones did you would lose the effect of their interaction or would the new state remain constant to become something useable as a boundary box for the qubit and qutrits inside?

Especially if you combine layering of qutrits and qubits.

Couldn’t you arrange the three in staggered stages so that as they collapse in their given direction the peaks combined with the spun protons carry information further into the system juicing the qubits and qutrits much further than pure quantum entanglement.

Need to learn about the Bell states more. And Not gates.

Quantum connection (not all gates shown). I realised I forgot some negative signs. I was thinking of this as a layer in a multilayered stack offset to each other diagonally around the center 1.5/-1.5.

So this doesn’t include all not gates drawn nor regular gates drawn but to give an idea of what photons could do increasing the spin of an electron without being an electron spun up to light speed (cooling advantage. May be able to run off new leds). But we have

14 1.5 transactions. (1/2, -1.5, -1/2, +1/2)

12 1/3 transactions. (1 1/3, -2/3, -1/3, +1/3)

56 1/2 transactions. (28 1/2, 28 -1/2)

Of which the

1.5, 1.3, 2/3, 1/3, 1/2 positives also have

-1.5, -1.3, -2/3, -1/3, -1/2 negatives.

Some of bonds are due to quantum entanglement and could create new reversible and non reversible gate types as well as length the entanglement between bits as they are produced.

Then again couldn’t quantum dots be shown down through a material to not expend as much heat and you run it off various leds types and it’s a room temperature quantum computer.


Quantum dot gets excited and releases electron into conductance band first into the system to get electron spin then lowered back to valence band to get (with uv help) emitting light so you can get different size quantum artificial atoms as well as colors for emittance. Multilayered quantum computing at the true speed of quantum dots light limited by uv pulse output.

Just an idea.


On Photons moving both backwards and forwards in time and why it’s important for computer construction.

First we know that photons are elementary particles that function both as a wave or a particle at a certain time though not both at once.

We know that we want to use either or for the production of bits of information. Particles for individual computations and waves for larger computations if enough bits of information can be read correctly at the same time waves may be superior at the cost of space used to propagate an answer. A single wave offering massive functionality within a larger area though they can be condensed if you refract the waves up one the nuclei of the atoms within each other without cross sectioning each other—though that may also be useful as an additional functionary device within the function schema. Perhaps if they cross they mean they multiple or if they don’t they remain untouched. If they interfere with an electron they divide. Something like that as a simple example. Individual particles get us exact answers over and over if read repeatedly. Very quickly and take little energy to wave reading unless you collapse a wave function into a rotational amount feasibly readable as though they were particles. You don’t need waves to read waves if you’re looking to collect specific bits of data Just sets of particles to oscillate and deform the readable wave function. You do need if you want a single read of an entire function in a go in one mass deformation. So you build a function map using all types of functions you might possibly want around in such a way that the photons moving both backwards and forwards/sideways in time have a chance to interact with the system. What you may be reading isn’t in fact the current set of photons but photons from the past passing through the system in reverse but since the male is segmented so that it repeats itself at various angles/degrees it may not matter. But you would know this by first placing it in the center of a room and bombarding it with photons and seeing which side lit up first. My understanding is that there are four positions from Feynman’s research a photon travels based on their delivery.

So eventually we get good enough at bouncing these waves and particles of photons throughout the system of lattices to get multiple answers at once Multiplied by the number of deformation levels we want (each wave particle is computer generated to deform through the run systematically causing little to no error outside of the lasers need to be on the best gimbal possible). The thing about setting up a function map physically is that you can pick and choose which bits you want read from the read direction. But anyway we get good enough we get down to the gluon method using QCD which has eight methods of propagation. And that’s when we start bouncing gluons off of quarks in much the same method reducing the size exponentially further but in much the same manner. Then the real fun begins.