On Photons moving both backwards and forwards in time and why it’s important for computer construction.

First we know that photons are elementary particles that function both as a wave or a particle at a certain time though not both at once.

We know that we want to use either or for the production of bits of information. Particles for individual computations and waves for larger computations if enough bits of information can be read correctly at the same time waves may be superior at the cost of space used to propagate an answer. A single wave offering massive functionality within a larger area though they can be condensed if you refract the waves up one the nuclei of the atoms within each other without cross sectioning each other—though that may also be useful as an additional functionary device within the function schema. Perhaps if they cross they mean they multiple or if they don’t they remain untouched. If they interfere with an electron they divide. Something like that as a simple example. Individual particles get us exact answers over and over if read repeatedly. Very quickly and take little energy to wave reading unless you collapse a wave function into a rotational amount feasibly readable as though they were particles. You don’t need waves to read waves if you’re looking to collect specific bits of data Just sets of particles to oscillate and deform the readable wave function. You do need if you want a single read of an entire function in a go in one mass deformation. So you build a function map using all types of functions you might possibly want around in such a way that the photons moving both backwards and forwards/sideways in time have a chance to interact with the system. What you may be reading isn’t in fact the current set of photons but photons from the past passing through the system in reverse but since the male is segmented so that it repeats itself at various angles/degrees it may not matter. But you would know this by first placing it in the center of a room and bombarding it with photons and seeing which side lit up first. My understanding is that there are four positions from Feynman’s research a photon travels based on their delivery.

So eventually we get good enough at bouncing these waves and particles of photons throughout the system of lattices to get multiple answers at once Multiplied by the number of deformation levels we want (each wave particle is computer generated to deform through the run systematically causing little to no error outside of the lasers need to be on the best gimbal possible). The thing about setting up a function map physically is that you can pick and choose which bits you want read from the read direction. But anyway we get good enough we get down to the gluon method using QCD which has eight methods of propagation. And that’s when we start bouncing gluons off of quarks in much the same method reducing the size exponentially further but in much the same manner. Then the real fun begins.

-J.

Ideas on quantum computing. Spiral quantum computer. Cross index 3-d. Solid or superfluid oxygen low loss fast switching optical switch (radial).

These are all just ideas I’ve had over the past few days while I can’t sleep or am bored.

Set up the connections between electron joints so that parallel connections pattern predictably once mapped.

Image 1

You do this by applying rings of electrons fast enough but not overbearing around Atoms until you find their wave functions.

Then you join them.

Then their rotational points are juiced and patterned. Cross index in 3-d. And you get a matrix for full computation within a finite space. Using atoms with differing wave functions gives you depending on whether you want to get past qubit measurements and get into the next area after that by superimposing vastly more options of travel and spin then you’ll see that not only does it go side ways and up but backwards and down as well. Start from the center or not. It just changes the speed of retaliation and production against the boundaries.

Then you can get patterns within patterns. Fractal states of information as collisions occur and you build higher function math from them.

Quantum computer uses light. Photons.

Ultra fast low loss optical switching.

Mass of a proton:

electron mass / 1836 =

4.96153789 × 10-34 kilograms

0.00000000000000000000000000000496153789kg

4.96153789 * (10^(-34)) kilograms =

4.96153789 × 10^-19 picograms

1 picogram [pg] = 602213665167.52 Atomic mass unit [u]

Carbon 12.0107 u = 7.2330077e+12 pg

Oxygen 8 u = 4.8177093e+12 pg

You’d have a pyramid of carbon with an atom of oxygen fullerene in the center as an optical switch reinforced outside from the temp so there’s only needed size for photon transmission. Heat cool the inside to keep it change state between solid aNd liquid or just solid.

If solid it’s blue—supposedly best colour being the coolest. It’s easily space stable but may burn out unless super fluid. But you could lattice it as a liquid and freeze it using carbon as the cooling agent to get below superfluid state becoming optically superclear as long as the fullerene pyramids are secured and wrapped in tape or foil to not over expand and keep fluid stably inside container. But -455 is 22 times ish larger than their earth size. So you’d make crystal lattices of solid oxygen and focus the beams as well as build switching beams.

So not tiny but not huge either. 170 x 22 1700 3400 3740 pm. Per carbon. Times two 7480 pm. .007480 microns.

Oh no you wouldn’t. You’d do a radial encompassing of carbon. Not a pyramid unless tiny focus is needed. Radial allows tubular bonds and liquid oxygen superfluid construction around any angle.

Radial design.

Image 2

Audio transcript:

So with the electrons of liquid oxygen cooled to the level of space which I think is negative 400 degrees so that’s at least minus 200 kelvin. So that make that a solid. You line up the electron points. Where they bond and those are your focal points. For the uh low loss high precision light switch and you can get a directional one by cycling the speed of the electron spin as they’re bonded because as they slow down because they’re a solid I don’t know if they’re going to stop or not or if they would,but you’d measure the cycle of number eight is bailable for this number of micro seconds and then it goes 7 dead (or less depending on bit rate) and then 8 again and it’ll carry it so you just ping it on number 8 it carries it around and pings it to the next part and if you wanted to you could ping it continuously all the valence electrons for oxygen or however many are avail label in the build which I think there are 2 since it’s a single atom build easier and less fractal but you could easily add more. It’s a lot of time. Once you do the timing you should be good really.

You could double bond 3 of the carbon from the oxygen and have 4 times the connection speed. It depends on what you want.

If atomic clocks can measure the state of electrons jumping 1/1836 times that will measure the speed of a photon over some distance. Assume C. Electron is 2200 km /sec /1836= 1.19825708061 so we know that the distance traveled is roughly 1.2 kilometers away so you’d have a receiver there. Node system. entanglement is roughly useful because you can have non entangled and entangled as 1/0 and as long as placement is correct they should start computing relative to outside forces. Does an entangle particle hitting another entangled particle make a quad or does it split it into four single lower states. Do the states become additive or are they reversing between each other.

You just build receivers that can take both types in either state fired from either an array a cube or sphere to and encompassing shape of a larger size that lets you translate the material into knowable mathematics.

From there if you can get change states between entangled and non that travel the same distance to be received you can create higher order math functions.

Can you Tri split a photon. Yes. Can a photon be split into it natural seven or so states of light waves. All of those are information schema. Or mathematical languages/operators if you want to base them off of straight photon is 1/0. It’s just a matter of figuring out the distances needed to travel to receive and translate. Then you take those early examples and speed them up to shorten the distance until you get any size ( high heat) photon receiving you want. But blue is probably easiest. Perhaps the liquid oxygen optical switch will help. Then you build solid optical switches in each wave length and each receiver ship, likely different distances based on wave function until you get them small enough.

Easiest way to do this is to build them on stands (rural or on top of buildings) that have no interruptions within their path, or the ability because light refracts on mass to aim it as needed. You’ll lose packets if you hit a bird, clouds or smog. Any diffusion. I wonder what the accuracy if teleportation was within. Which boundary. Probably classified.

Image 3

Image 4

quantum-computing.m4a

Image 5

F function determined by wavelength depth, speed. Position relative to others in series until we reach f alpha or the function asked for. Refraction plays a big part in this too.

Transmission both forwards and backwards. Hits wave length. Gather wavelength at specific point. Determine value by mapping wave lengths values in physical space as numerical weights or as percentages or what have you–some operator through the deterministic material. Wave length can continue or stop but it comes into contact with receiving layer or the function layer which accepts the photon and creates a value. Continues southward until all functions and types of functions are determined.

light-changing-colour-quantum-computer..m4a

This is what I’ve got so far. I don’t know if it will work but it’s what I would try to see what happens.

Edit 1/29/19: