Pd300F290 Build. Can I ask for help with the output/ delta Epsilon in the video please.

Sorry for the long video but I didn’t want to alter it or speed it up so that you can see that it’s real.

Pd300F290 by Jordan Townsend. Minimization, and readouts for Energy and delta Epsilon. Done Twice.

So is this useful or something inherently dangerous outside of the basis of electricity being dangerous? Other than the -beta decay from the Pd, but we put it in teeth so I’m unsure if people care. It’s just that it lasts so long and can combine with the F while still obeying the rules. So it seems like a win as long as it shielded properly.

Edit: In response to the reddit posting asking for clarification:

Sorry for the lousy load time, I should have just put it on youtube.

Okay, let me see if I have the parts in order:

It’s minimizing the collection of atoms that I’ve put together into a chemical framework near ideal. By doing that it’s trying to get the proper bond length/atom position that gives an Energy readout within a boundary of if there’s an x-y graph, and delta is on the x axis and there are two points plus/minus delta (though I don’t know the unit—so assuming kJ/mol?) then it should assure that there is that Energy output within the y axis between two points plus/minus Epsilon (same unit). Uses a Universal Force Field (UFF). That’s my understanding for that.

If that’s true and that energy level is possible with those materials (can it be an electrical potential like lithium ion since you can use trace Pd or stable Pd depending on what’s available?), if possible to be built reasonable or for specialty uses, then is it useful as an energy source, or does that mean that it’s just explosive chemically and unsafe.

My software is limited as is my income as I’m on disability so I’ve only been able to find one software that I can afford, and these are the functions that it offers—within the reasonability of my hardware, which is years old at this point.

Did that help at all? I’m trying to research battery alternatives using long lasting element types that are stable if possible. Bill Gates is looking for a stage IV reactor, and so I’m just working towards that getting to the worlds needs one step at a time until I get the (or a range) of potential solutions. Thanks for your patience with the video by the way.

Sorry forgot to add in the numbers if they’re not visible from the video:
6592896 kJ/mole. = 1831.36 kWh
628.95 delta Epsilon.
Mole weight: 37435.54 g/mole. = 37.43554 kg.
This is just for comparison purposes:

Tesla Roadster has 833 kg Battery pack.
Assuming we can fit the same amount of this in the same space, and that they are equally packed. We can fit 833/37.43554= 22.25158 Units in the battery pack.
22.25158 x 1831.36 kWh = 40750.65355 kWh if rounded up.
Their car can go 200 kWh. So we divide 40750.65354/200kWh x 1000 km = range = 203,753.268 km or 126,606.411 miles per charge.

Folding Covid-19, Corona Virus using flash Photolysis onto itself to become inert at the Guanine + Uracil joins with hydrolysis.

Corona Virus’s

What we need to have to fight it. Just an idea.

Identification of damaging units of RNA 
Protease reduction at site of entry. Something to absorb the hydrolysis., or at the very least move it away from the affected areas. 

The 5’ methylated CH3 chain can be blocked by using Flash Photolysis to destroy the hydrogen that cuts into the amino acid/peptide. Breaking the chain so that the methylated cap binds to itself leaving only C Remainder bond open for set up. 

Couldnt we intercept the Triple adenine base messenger RNA with Uracil or even Guanine if they can make it through and then flash them as well if its even needed as it could become inert at that point. At that point the Damaging RNA is connectionless. Just within the cell.

So what we could build is a chain of Uracil since they’re hydrogen, and excite them with an extra electron and add them to the end of the adenine seeing as you need 6 hydrogen. So it’s a matter of folding the carbon in on itself through propulsed flashing and then swinging it to bond to the other end of the virus making them inert.  

Attachment.png

Flash CH3 at H then fold carbons: Guanine to opposing Uracil so that the virus becomes inert in a self folded way. Would be shaped inwardly.

So what happens if we insert these builds into the system through a breathing device after they’ve been flashed so that the farthest depth can be reached within the body making sure that the red blood cells carry the good stuff to the damaged area, so that they reach the cells that are affected, transfer into the systems of the cells, or at least bump into them, and cause the folding from interferons doing their duty once they realize that the virus is now inert and they can take it as waste to be disposed of while alerting other cells for the same infection. 

But how to do this within a syringe. Flashing seems simple enough to, rapidly done over the body. Painful and dangerous perhaps due to the weakened state of the patient. Perhaps an IV that keeps the body cool and creates a greater heat difference between the virus RNA and the cell its infecting so that they can be found and flashed without bringing the overall temperature of the human body into unsafe measures. 

Then it’s a matter of developing an interferon that can be made outside the body and with the inert virus folded so that it knows to attack it, which is should naturally know because its an unknown. Though it may present fever which may worsen people respiratory infections. 

3B2979CA-C4E8-43A1-89AD-F5E51367D45D.jpeg

FPd50 from FPd5 crystal to Larger build 5th dimensional geometric chemistry to produce stable balanced larger scale power with a relatively low delta epsilon.

This is the “crystal” I designed using fluoride and palladium. It’s stable other than palladium’s beta decay but if we’re using it in teeth people must not care too much. talking millions of years here for a half life.
This is a larger build that is significantly heavier but much more powerful.

I compare things to Tesla 2020 roadsters battery pacts because it’s the only thing I’ve got to compare to. But here are my numbers after three minimizations:

Rerun on 2/24/2020

Energy: 6575298 kJ/Mole

Delta Epsilon: 282.72

Run again after jolting coordinates: Energy 6573762

Delta Epsilon: 310.07

Run once more: Energy 6571750 kJ/Mole

Delta Epsilon: 178.80

So let’s just say it’s 6570000 kJ/mol with a delta epsilon under 180 ish.

6570000kJ= 1825kWh
1 unit = 37.54953 kg

833/ 37.54953= 22.18403 units per weight replacement.

(22.18403×1825 kWh) / 200 kWh x 1000 km = 202,429.274 kilometers or 125,783.719 miles.

So if it’s feasible to build these, which I think I have a way of doing, wouldn’t they be better than lithium ion? I think them getting wet is an issue in that they would expand but shielding can be put into place.

Sorry for the blurry photo. Watch the videos for more information.

Much pleasure,

-J.

Monopoles and their descriptions/combination at certain eV’s By Jordan Townsend, February 18th, 2020.

+/- electrons from valence shells. This may be what makes them hard to make. Though it takes 297. kJ/mol to force the electron off of the atom maximum of hydrogen, so it’s a matter of finding the right electrical output to force these conditions. It may be a constant feed to get it to work too.

First iteration:

Made up of 15 atoms:

4^+4 Silicon Prism

Connected to a ruthenium core.
On either side are 3 Na atoms, One side being +1 each, the other Side being -1 each.

4^+4 carbon Prism.

At molecular orbital -1.39 eV 2e- you get this Positive Monopole: at the +4 carbon prism with Na assistance.

At -.99 eV 2e- you get this:

At the +4 silicon prism without Na assistance.

But if electrostatic potential is taken you get this:

The opposing negative force along it’s entirety. This is what is worrying me. That the system is malfunctioning and showing the wrong information.

If the carbons are 4^-4 you get the same build. Photos can be added to show you but they’re the same.

So let’s move on to the Negative build:


Now if you change the materials to Si prisms you get a different build.


At -1.17 eV 2e- you get with one -1 Na assistance.

At -.99 eV 2e- you get a pure Si prism.

with a weaker electrostatic potential. Still of the opposite type.

If you change one of the prisms to 4^-4 charge then the build remains the same for the same eV

If a combination of 4^-4, and 4^+4 prisms using just carbons at -1.39 eV 2e- are used you get Negative:

over the 4^+4 prism and at -1.12 eV 2e- you get this:

And with it’s electrostatic potential you get:

So that would be a dipole magnet and not of use to our builds. So my thoughts are there are combinations with the inert atom Ruthenium that works as a blocking agent of the magnetic pole to only allow one spin per one side while denying the spin of the other side depending on flow of electrons.

Knowing that they’re negative. It’ll likely flow towards the silicon since it can do both monopole types.

#but how does it over come the inert nature of the ruthenium. I would think quantum tunneling of a single atom given enough force would allow the receptive atoms to attain their electrons needed for the monopole to work.

Down below is a 10 atom version of a monopole: F5Pd5 100% Stable.

From all points forward it will be the upper bound of the eV that is used as highlighted here.

If you exchange for chlorine you get a nearly fully circular monopole.

Electrostatic potential is also positive. An improvement there.

Using Br.

Using I.

F and I between Pd gives a negative monopole, but if we add a Pd atom to the right side Pd atom we get the same shape of molecular orbital but it’s a reversed monopole.

The problem I have is that I don’t know for sure whether the Electrostatic Potential over rides the Molecular Orbital or if the Orbital can be of use if pressed in deeply enough or counteracted in some way as with the Iodine’s shape. But this is what I’ve come up with so far.

Much pleasure,
-J.